Congress always says that BJP is a communal party and dividing India on the grounds of religion. I always wonder how congress can say that. Congress themselves dividing India and Indians on the basis of religion and caste.

Here are some points I want to raise.

Our respected Priminister Manmohan singh once said, “Minorities have first right to use Indian resources”. What does this statement mean? Is this secularism?

Congress is giving religion based reservation in Andhra Pradesh. Is this secularism?

Once our home minister P.Chidambaram was giving an statement in parliament on malegaon blast and use words like “Hindu terrorism”. When BJP opposed, Chidambaram said, “I can’t change my words to make BJP or RSS happy”. In India we have hundreds of attacks in which people of other religion were involved. Did Chidambaram ever associate the name of that religion with terrorism? No, he never did. Is this secularism?

In Maharashtra Congress didn’t take any tough action against MNS goons and Raj thakray neither when they were beating and killing North Indians
nor when they were violently protesting Amitabh bachchan movie “The Last Lear” on the issue of jaya bachchan speaking in Hindi. But just for the
smooth release of “My name is khan” Congress employed all the Maharashtra Police, and the result was the Pune blast. Police were beating shiv sainiks with lathis(zameen par gira gira ke). I was not with Shiv sena on the issue of “My name is khan”, all I want to know from Congress Party is that why Police didn’t take the same tough action against MNS goons. Are lives of north Indians and our national language Hindi is less important than Shahrukh khan’s movie. Is this secularism?

Congress leaders always criticize Gujarat riots and Narendra Modi. Yes, that was shameful what had happened during Gujarat riots and surely
Narendra modi should have done more to protect minorities. But why congress never criticizes Godhara Kand in which 60 Hindus had been burned alive by local minorities. Why congress doesn’t blame Farukh Abdulla for the killing of thousand of Kashmiri Pandits in kashmir. Five lakhs Kashmiri Pandits had been forced to leave kashmir with all their property leaving behind. Now they are living like refugees in their own so called Hindu majority country. And how can we forget killing of thousands of Sikhs by Congress workers after the assassination of Indira Gandhi. Is this secularism?

Congress leader Digvijay singh went to azamgarh and said, “Batla house encounter in Delhi was fake”. A day before Digvijay singh had made this
statement, Shahzad, one of the accused of batla house encounter himself accepted that he had hit bullets on inspector Mohan chand sharma. What
Digvijay singh wanted to gain by giving such an absurd and foolish statement? Is this secularism?

Congress doesn’t even critisize M.F.Hussain who made nude pictures of Hindu Gods and Bharat mata. After all Congress did criticize dutch painter
who made painting of Mohammad sahab. Is this secularism?

I think it is enough to prove the pseudosecularism of Congress party. For Congress vote bank politics is above everything.

In India secularism means insulting Hindus, Hindu Culture and Hindu religion.

Popularity: 44% [?]

I know you want to ask me this, why Shahrukh should say thank you to Shiv sena. Because Shahrukh’s movie my name is khan just achieved HIT status in India with a total business of Rs. 73 crores, thanks to shiv sena’s protest.

If Shiv sena had not protested the release of my name is khan (that bring huge publicity for the movie), the movie would never have got HIT status and would have been an average movie in India. And box office collections could have been lower by 15-20 crores.

My name is khan did fantastic business in week one just because of the controversy created by Shiv sena. But after that collections dropped by 70% every weak.

Many people and our media are comparing my name is khan with Three idiots. But if you see difference between the box office collections of both the films you will find that you just can’t compare these two films.

The first week collections of Three idiots (79 crores) are higher than the total collections of MNIK (73 crores).

Here is a table containing collections of Bollywood’s major hit films in recent times.

Popularity: 55% [?]

It seems true if you see what congress leaders Mr. Vilasrao deshmukh (former Maharashtra C.M. of Congress) and Manish tiwari(Congress Spokesperson) are saying about Mr. Amitabh bachchan.

Vilasrao deshmukh is saying he can share a stage with Mr. Bachchan if Amitabh bachchan is ready to quit his Gujarat’s brand ambassador job. And Manish tiwari has already demanded a clarification from Amitabh bachchan that Mr. Bachchan condemns Narendra Modi’s role in Gujarat riots or not.

First I want to ask a question from Mr. Deshmukh and Tiwari, Is it a crime being Gujarat’s brand ambassador? No, Mr. Deshmukh It’s not. Amitabh bachchan is neither glorofying Modi nor his role in godhara riots (Which is not proved yet).

Why didn’t Manish tiwari ask same question to Ratan tata who once said, “You are stupid if you are not here(Gujarat) “. Where was Mr. Tiwari When Mukesh Ambani, Anil Ambani, Sunil Mittal and other business tycoons were all glorifying Narendra Modi and his works in Gujarat in the same summit. And when same is being said by Amitabh Bachchan for Guajarat and Gujarati people, he is asking ridiculous questions.

I know why they are all targetting Mr. Amitabh bachchan and Modi without any reason, First they are trying to make sonia gandhi happy by critisizing Modi and Bachchan(two enemies of Gandhi family), and second, of course, they want Gujrati people to forget Modi’s contribution in Gujarat’s development.

Gujarat is actually one of the best states in India with no power shortage and pathetic roads. I know how difficult it is do business in U.P. with just 10 hours of electricity per day.

Video – Ratan Tata praises Narendra Modi

Video – Anil Ambani praises Narendra Modi

Popularity: 100% [?]